The Biden administration's decision to send cluster munitions to Ukraine has sparked a heated debate. Cluster munitions are controversial weapons that have been banned by over 100 nations due to the danger they pose to civilians. Despite the concerns raised by human rights organizations and key allies, the US National Security Council spokesperson, John Kirby, defended the decision, stating that Ukraine intends to use the cluster munitions to defend their own territory against Russian positions.

The issue at hand is the risk of civilian casualties and the potential for unexploded ordnance to harm innocent civilians, particularly children. Critics argue that these weapons should never be used as they can maim and kill innocent civilians long after the fighting is over. The danger lies in the fact that not all bomblets explode upon impact, and they can remain on the ground, acting as de facto landmines.

While some Democrats and Republicans have differing opinions on the matter, it is clear that the use of cluster munitions goes against the international prohibition agreed upon by more than 120 countries. Critics also warn that the US providing these weapons could set a dangerous precedent, encouraging other nations to also disregard the ban.

The Biden administration contends that supplying cluster munitions to Ukraine is necessary due to the urgent need for additional weaponry. Ukrainian forces are reportedly running low on conventional artillery shells, and the cluster munitions would provide them with an advantage against Russian troops.

The debate surrounding the use of cluster munitions is far from settled. The potential humanitarian cost of these weapons is a significant concern, and critics argue that the US should not be supporting their use. The situation in Ukraine remains fluid, and it remains to be seen how the use of cluster munitions will affect the ongoing conflict.